Sport Tourism Experience

Sport Tourism Experience
  • Description

In a 500-750 word essay, create a sport tourism experience. This could be an event, active customer participation, or nostalgia. Describe the details surrounding the experience, and be sure to include the following in your essay:

  1. Identify and provide a brief description and purpose of the experience, including identification of the target market.
  2. Is this an international experience? If it is, how would its considerations differ from a noninternational experience? If it is not an international experience, how would it differ from one that is?
  3. What sport professionals you would need to complement the experience and why? If no sport professionals would be needed, explain why.
  4. Expenses: How much would your experience cost? Include compensation for individual sport professionals (salaries, accommodations, and other expenses), vendor costs, operational services (facility prep and cleaning, security [including traffic control], transportation, etc.), advertising/promotion, and administrative expenses.
  5. Funding and revenues: What would be your sources of funding and their projected monetary support? Explain how the experience will be generating revenue and project how much?
  6. Cap this assignment by projecting a simple ROI, showing your calculations.

Be sure to include three to five references.

Sports Tourism Experience 

 1

Unsatisfactory

0.00%

2

Less than Satisfactory

65.00%

3

Satisfactory

75.00%

4

Good

85.00%

5

Excellent

100.00%

80.0 %Content 
15.0 %Definition of the Sports Tourism Experience, Including Type, Purpose, and the Target MarketSubject knowledge is not demonstrated or is poorly demonstrated. Definition of the sports tourism experience, including its type, purpose, and target market, is absent, inappropriate, or irrelevant.Subject knowledge is unclear or inconsistent. Definition of the sports tourism experience, including type and purpose, is vague or incomplete. Coverage of the target market is weak or marginal with gaps in presentation. Supporting material is often confusing, inappropriate.Some subject knowledge is evident. Basic definition of the sports tourism experience, including type and purpose, is provided. Basic coverage of the target market is provided. Supporting material is of baseline acceptable quality and quantity.Subject knowledge is solid. Definition of the sports tourism experience, including type and purpose, is clear and well-integrated with coverage of the target market. Supporting material is of good quality and quantity.Thorough subject knowledge and understanding are demonstrated. Definition of the sports tourism experience, including type and purpose, is thorough and well-integrated with the target market. Examples and personal insight to further understanding are provided.
10.0 %Explanation of Considerations to Be Made for an International Experience vs. a Noninternational ExperienceSubject knowledge is not demonstrated or is poorly demonstrated. Examination of considerations to be made for an international experience vs. a noninternational experience is absent, inappropriate, or irrelevant.Subject knowledge is unclear or inconsistent. Examination of considerations to be made for an international experience vs. a noninternational experience is vague or incomplete. Supporting material is often confusing, inappropriate.Some subject knowledge is evident. Basic examination of considerations to be made for an international experience vs. a noninternational experience is provided. Supporting material is of baseline acceptable quality and quantity.Subject knowledge is solid. Examination of considerations to be made for an international experience vs. a noninternational experience is clear and well-integrated. Supporting material is of good quality and quantity.Thorough subject knowledge and understanding are demonstrated. Examination of considerations to be made for an international experience vs. a noninternational experience is thorough and well-integrated. Examples and personal insight to further understanding are provided.
10.0 %Discussion of Whether or Not Sport Professionals Are Needed to Complement the Experience, Why, and Who They Might Be (If Needed)Subject knowledge is not demonstrated or is poorly demonstrated. Discussion of whether or not sport professionals are needed to complement the experience, why, and who they might be is absent, inappropriate, or irrelevant.Subject knowledge is unclear or inconsistent. Discussion of whether or not sport professionals are needed to complement the experience, why, and who they might be is vague or incomplete. Supporting material is often confusing, inappropriate.Some subject knowledge is evident. Basic discussion of whether or not sport professionals are needed to complement the experience, why, and who they might be is provided, but only on a cursory level. Supporting material is of baseline acceptable quality and quantity.Subject knowledge is solid. Discussion of whether or not sport professionals are needed to complement the experience, why, and who they might be is clear and well-integrated. Discussion of this sport experience element is clearly articulated. Supporting material is of good quality and quantity.Thorough subject knowledge and understanding are demonstrated. Discussion of whether or not sport professionals are needed to complement the experience, why, and who they might be is thorough and well-integrated. Discussion of this experience element is clearly developed, using examples and personal insight to further understanding.
15.0 %Explanation of a Variety of Expenses Associated With the Experience: Compensation for Sport Professionals (If Applicable), Vendor Costs, Operational Services, Advertising and Promotion, and Administrative ExpensesSubject knowledge is not demonstrated or is poorly demonstrated. Explanation of a variety of expenses associated as listed in the assignment is absent, inappropriate, or irrelevant.Subject knowledge is unclear or inconsistent. Explanation of a variety of expenses associated as listed in the assignment is vague or incomplete. Supporting material is often confusing, inappropriate.Some subject knowledge is evident. Basic explanation of a variety of expenses associated as listed in the assignment is provided, but on a cursory level. Supporting material is of baseline acceptable quality and quantity.Subject knowledge is solid. Explanation of a variety of expenses associated as listed in the assignment is clear and well-integrated. Discussion of this sport experience business element is clearly articulated. Supporting material is of good quality and quantity.Thorough subject knowledge and understanding are demonstrated. Explanation of a variety of expenses associated as listed in the assignment is thorough and well-integrated. Discussion of this sport experience business element is clearly developed, using examples and personal insight to further understanding.
15.0 %Explanation of Funding Sources and Projected Monetary Amounts, Including How and How Much Revenue Will Be GeneratedSubject knowledge is not demonstrated or is poorly demonstrated. Explanation of funding and projected monetary amounts, including revenue to be generated, is absent, inappropriate, or irrelevant.Subject knowledge is unclear or inconsistent. Explanation of funding and projected monetary amounts, including revenue to be generated, is vague or incomplete. Supporting material is often confusing, inappropriate.Some subject knowledge is evident. Basic explanation of funding and projected monetary amounts, including revenue to be generated, is provided, but only on a cursory level. Supporting material is of baseline acceptable quality and quantity.Subject knowledge is solid. Explanation of funding and projected monetary amounts, including revenue to be generated, is clear and well-integrated. Discussion of these sport experience elements is clearly articulated. Supporting material is of good quality and quantity.Thorough subject knowledge and understanding are demonstrated. Explanation of funding and projected monetary amounts, including revenue to be generated, is thorough and well-integrated. Discussion of these sport experience elements is clearly developed, using examples and personal insight to further understanding.
10.0 %Projection of the sport experience ROI, Including Calculations That Support the ProjectionSubject knowledge is not demonstrated or is poorly demonstrated. Projection of the sport experience ROI, including calculations to support the projection, is absent, inappropriate, or irrelevant.Subject knowledge is unclear or inconsistent. Projection of the sport experience ROI, including calculations to support the projection, is vague or incomplete. Supporting material is often confusing, inappropriate.Some subject knowledge is evident. A projection of the sport experience ROI, including calculations to support the projection, is provided, but only on a cursory level. Supporting material is of baseline acceptable quality and quantity.Subject knowledge is solid. Projection of the sport experience ROI, including calculations to support the projection, is clear and well-integrated. Discussion of this sport experience element is clearly articulated. Supporting material is of good quality and quantity.Thorough subject knowledge and understanding are demonstrated. Projection of the sport experience ROI, including calculations to support the projection, is thorough and well-integrated. Discussion of this sport experience element is clearly developed, using examples and personal insight to further understanding.
5.0 %Research Sources (Appropriate, Sufficient, and Relevant)Required references are not used or cited as required in the assignment instructions, or noncredible sources are used.Relevance of required references is vague or inconsistent. References from appropriate sources are not included: three to five resources inclusive of assigned readings.Relevance of required references is mostly applicable and appropriate. References from appropriate sources are included: three to five resources inclusive of assigned readings.Relevance of required references is applicable and appropriate in all instances. References from appropriate sources are included: five or more resources inclusive of assigned readings.Relevance of required references is applicable and appropriate in all instances and sparks interest in the reader to pursue further investigation. References from appropriate sources are included: more than five resources inclusive of assigned readings.
17.0 %Organization and Effectiveness 
6.0 %Thesis Development and PurposePaper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.Thesis or main claim is insufficiently developed or vague; purpose is not clear.Thesis or main claim is apparent and appropriate to purpose.Thesis or main claim is clear and forecast the development of the paper. It is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.Thesis or main claim is comprehensive; contained within the thesis is the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
6.0 %Paragraph Development and TransitionsParagraphs and transitions consistently lack unity and coherence. Apparent connections between paragraphs are established. Transitions are inappropriate to purpose and scope. Organization is disjointed.Some paragraphs and transitions may lack logical progression of ideas, unity, coherence, or cohesiveness. Some degree of organization is evident.Paragraphs are generally competent, but ideas may show some inconsistency in organization and/or in their relationships to each other.Paragraphs have a logical progression of ideas between paragraphs is apparent. Paragraphs exhibit a unity, coherence, and cohesiveness. Topic sentences and concluding remarks are appropriate to purpose.There is a sophisticated construction of paragraphs and transitions. Ideas progress and relate to each other. Paragraph and transition construction guide the reader. Paragraph structure is seamless.
5.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used.Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
3.0 %Format 
1.0 %Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)Template is not used appropriately, or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent.Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style.All format elements are correct.
2.0 %Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)Sources are not documented.Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.

Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.

100 %Total Weightage 

 

Our Score
[Total: 0 Av: 0]
Find Us On Social Media

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes:

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>