Fundraising plan for a non-profit sports organization

Fundraising plan for a non-profit sports organization
$8.99
  • Description

The purpose of the assignment is to create a fundraising plan for a nonprofit sports organization of your choice.

In 1,000-1,250 words, include the following information in the fundraising plan:

  1. What is the organization, what does it do, and where is it located?
  2. What is the mission or cause of the organization and what specific elements make the organizational mission unique?
  3. Identify three potential fundraising activities that could be used to generate revenue for the organization and explain the primary objective of each activity.
  4. Select one of the fundraising activities you have identified and create a brief profile of the perfect event for this activity.
  5. Identify three specific, quantifiable goals of the organization to be accomplished through the proceeds of the fundraising project and discuss how these goals align with the goals and mission of the organization.

 1

Unsatisfactory

0.00%

2

Less than Satisfactory

65.00%

3

Satisfactory

75.00%

4

Good

85.00%

5

Excellent

100.00%

75.0 %Content 
25.0 %Examination of a Nonprofit Sports Organization as to Its Name, Location, Function, Mission/Cause, and Elements That Make It UniqueSubject knowledge is not demonstrated or is poorly demonstrated. Examination of a nonprofit sports organization as to name, location, function, mission/cause, and elements of its uniqueness is absent, inappropriate, or irrelevant.Subject knowledge is unclear or inconsistent. Examination of a nonprofit sports organization as to name, location, function, mission/cause, and elements of its uniqueness is vague or incomplete. Integration of the function, mission/cause, and elements of uniqueness of the organization is poorly made, confusing, or irrelevant. Supporting material is weak or marginal with gaps in presentation.Some subject knowledge is evident. A basic examination of a nonprofit sports organization as to name, location, function, mission/cause, and elements of its uniqueness is provided. Basic discussion explaining the integration of the function, mission/cause, and elements of uniqueness of the organization is made, but only on a cursory level and may contain some inconsistencies in integration. Supporting material is of baseline acceptable quality and quantity.Subject knowledge is solid. Examination of a nonprofit sports organization as to name, location, function, mission/cause, and elements of its uniqueness is clearly articulated. Discussion explaining the integration of the function, mission/cause, and elements of uniqueness of the organization is clear and well-integrated. Supporting material is of good quality and quantity.Thorough subject knowledge and understanding are demonstrated. Examination of a nonprofit sports organization as to name, location, function, mission/cause, and elements of its uniqueness is thorough and well-integrated. Discussion explaining the integration of the function, mission/cause, and elements of uniqueness of the organization is clearly developed, using examples and personal insight to further reader understanding. Supporting material is of exceptional quality and quantity.
25.0 %Identification of Three Potential Fundraising Activities, Brief Explanation of the Primary Objective of Each, Selection of One of the Activities, and Creation of a Profile of the Perfect Event for ItSubject knowledge is not demonstrated or is poorly demonstrated. Identification of three potential fundraising activities and brief explanation of the primary objective of each are absent, inappropriate, or irrelevant. A specific activity is not selected, and a profile of the perfect event for it is not created.Subject knowledge is unclear or inconsistent. Identification of three potential fundraising activities and a brief explanation of the primary objective of each are vague or incomplete. Selection of a specific activity and creation of a profile of the perfect event for it are poorly accomplished, confusing, or irrelevant. Supporting material is weak or marginal with gaps in presentation.Some subject knowledge is evident. A basic identification of three potential fundraising activities and a brief explanation of the primary objective of each are provided. Selection of a specific activity and creation of a profile of the perfect event for it are discussed, but on a cursory level and may contain some inconsistencies in integration. Supporting material is of baseline acceptable quality and quantity.Subject knowledge is solid. Identification of three potential fundraising activities and a brief explanation of the primary objective of each are clearly articulated. Selection of a specific activity and creation of a profile of the perfect event for it are clear and well-integrated. Supporting material is of good quality and quantity.Thorough subject knowledge and understanding are demonstrated. Identification of three potential fundraising activities and a brief explanation of the primary objective of each are thorough and well-integrated. Selection of a specific activity and creation of a profile of the perfect event for it are clearly developed, using examples and personal insight to further understanding. Supporting material is of exceptional quality and quantity.
25.0 %Identification of Three Specific, Quantifiable Organizational Goals the Fundraiser Proceeds Are Meant to Accomplish and an Explanation of How the Goals Align With the Goals and Mission of the OrganizationSubject knowledge is not demonstrated or is poorly demonstrated. Identification of three specific, quantifiable organizational goals the fundraiser proceeds are meant to accomplish and how the goals align with the goals and mission of the organization is absent, inappropriate, or irrelevant.Subject knowledge is unclear or inconsistent. Identification of three specific, quantifiable organizational goals the fundraiser proceeds are meant to accomplish is vague or incomplete. Explanation of how the goals align with the goals and mission of the organization is confusing or irrelevant. Supporting material is weak or marginal with gaps in presentation.Some subject knowledge is evident. Basic identification of three specific, quantifiable organizational goals the fundraiser proceeds are meant to accomplish is provided. Explanation of how the goals align with the goals and mission of the organization is presented, but at a cursory level and may contain some inconsistencies. Supporting material is of baseline acceptable quality and quantity.Subject knowledge is solid. Identification of three specific, quantifiable organizational goals the fundraiser proceeds are meant to accomplish is clearly articulated. Explanation of how the goals align with the goals and mission of the organization is clear and well-integrated. Supporting material is of good quality and quantity.Thorough subject knowledge and understanding are demonstrated. Identification of three specific, quantifiable organizational goals the fundraiser proceeds are meant to accomplish is thorough and well-integrated. Explanation of how the goals align with the goals and mission of the organization is clearly developed, using examples and personal insight to further understanding. Supporting material is of exceptional quality and quantity.
15.0 %Organization and Effectiveness 
5.0 %Thesis Development and PurposePaper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.Thesis or main claim is insufficiently developed or vague; purpose is not clear.Thesis or main claim is apparent and appropriate to purpose.Thesis or main claim is clear and forecast the development of the paper. It is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.Thesis or main claim is comprehensive; contained within the thesis is the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
5.0 %Paragraph Development and TransitionsParagraphs and transitions consistently lack unity and coherence. Apparent connections between paragraphs are established. Transitions are inappropriate to purpose and scope. Organization is disjointed.Some paragraphs and transitions may lack logical progression of ideas, unity, coherence, or cohesiveness. Some degree of organization is evident.Paragraphs are generally competent, but ideas may show some inconsistency in organization and/or in their relationships to each other.Paragraphs have a logical progression of ideas between paragraphs is apparent. Paragraphs exhibit a unity, coherence, and cohesiveness. Topic sentences and concluding remarks are appropriate to purpose.There is a sophisticated construction of paragraphs and transitions. Ideas progress and relate to each other. Paragraph and transition construction guide the reader. Paragraph structure is seamless.
5.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used.Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
10.0 %Format 
5.0 %Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)Template is not used appropriately, or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent.Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style.All format elements are correct.
5.0 %Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)Sources are not documented.Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.
100 %Total Weightage 

 

Our Score
[Total: 0 Av: 0]
Find Us On Social Media

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes:

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>