Evolution of Professional Sport 

Evolution of Professional Sport 
$9.99
  • Description

The purpose of this assignment is to create a timeline that documents the history and evolution of a professional sport, sporting event, or brand and to determine its impact on each segment of the sports business landscape.

In a presentation of 10-12 PowerPoint slides(notes when applicable with slides), not including cover and reference slides, document five major milestones and discuss their significance in the evolution of the sport, sporting event, or brand that you have selected. Address the following questions in your presentation:

  1. Why is each milestone that you have identified significant and who and what was affected?
  2. How has each milestone impacted or changed the product/promotion/performance of the sport, sporting event, or brand?
  3. How have the career paths within the sport, sporting event, or brand evolved over time, and what types of career options are available now?

Use two or three external resources to document and support your research. Ensure that you properly cite and reference all the sources used in your presentation.

Perferably over Nike Corporation but if you are more informative of a different segment that will work.

 

 1

Unsatisfactory

0.00%

2

Less than Satisfactory

65.00%

3

Satisfactory

75.00%

4

Good

85.00%

5

Excellent

100.00%

65.0 %Content 
20.0 %Explanation of the Significance of Five Major Timeline Milestones as Well As Who and What Were AffectedSubject knowledge is not demonstrated or is poorly demonstrated. Explanation of the significance of each milestone as well as who and what were affected is absent, inappropriate, or irrelevant.Subject knowledge is unclear or inconsistent. Explanation of the significance of each milestone is vague or incomplete. Coverage of who and what were affected is inconsistent and often irrelevant. In addition, the explanation does not meet the requirement of documenting five milestones. Supporting material is weak or marginal with gaps in presentation.Some subject knowledge is evident. Basic explanation of the significance of each milestone as related to who and what were affected is provided. The explanation documents five milestones as specified in the assignment. Supporting material is of baseline acceptable quality and quantity.Subject knowledge is solid. Explanation of the significance of each milestone as related to who and what were affected is clear and well-integrated. The explanation documents five milestones as specified in the assignment. Supporting material is of good quality and quantity.Thorough subject knowledge and understanding are demonstrated. Explanation of the significance of each milestone as related to who and what were affected is thorough and well-integrated. The explanation documents five milestones as specified in the assignment. Examples and personal insight to further understanding is provided. Supporting material is of exceptional quality and quantity.
20.0 %Examination of How Each Timeline Milestone Impacted or Changed Your Selected Product, Promotion, or Performance of the Sport, Sporting Event, or BrandSubject knowledge is not demonstrated or is poorly demonstrated. Examination of how the milestones impacted the selected product, promotion, or performance of the sport, sporting event, or brand is absent, inappropriate, or irrelevant.Subject knowledge is unclear or inconsistent. Examination of how the milestones impacted the selected product, promotion, or performance of the sport, sporting event, or brand is vague or incomplete. Supporting material is weak or marginal with gaps in presentation.Some subject knowledge is evident. Provides a basic examination of how the milestones impacted the product, promotion, or performance of the sport, sporting event, or brand, including impact or change of each. Supporting material is of baseline acceptable quality and quantity.Subject knowledge is solid. Examination of how the milestones impacted the selected product, promotion, or performance of the sport, sporting event, or brand is clear and well-integrated across the milestones. Supporting material is of good quality and quantity.Thorough subject knowledge and understanding is demonstrated. Examination of how the milestones impacted the selected product, promotion, or performance of the sport, sporting event, or brand is thorough and well-integrated across the milestones. Examples and personal insight to further understanding is provided. Supporting material is of exceptional quality and quantity.
20.0 %Examination of How Related Career Paths Within the Sport, Sporting Event, or Brand Have Evolved Over Time and What Types of Career Options Are Currently AvailableSubject knowledge is not demonstrated or is poorly demonstrated. Examination of how career paths in the sport, sporting event, or brand have evolved over time and the current availability of career options is absent, inappropriate, or irrelevant.Subject knowledge is unclear or inconsistent. Examination of how career paths in the sport, sporting event, or brand have evolved over time and the current availability of career options is not discussed, or is irrelevant. Supporting material is weak or marginal with gaps in presentation.Some subject knowledge is evident. A basic examination of how career paths in the sport, sporting event, or brand have evolved over time and the current availability of career options is provided on a cursory level. Supporting material is of baseline acceptable quality and quantity.Subject knowledge is solid. Examination of how career paths in the sport, sporting event, or brand have evolved over time is clear and well-integrated. Discussion of current availability of career options is clearly articulated. Supporting material is of good quality and quantity.Thorough subject knowledge and understanding is demonstrated. Examination of how career paths in the sport, sporting event, or brand have evolved over time is thorough and well-integrated. Discussion of current availability of career options is clearly developed, using examples and personal insight to further understanding. Supporting material is of exceptional quality and quantity.
5.0 %Research Sources (Appropriate, Sufficient, Relevant, Etc.)Sources are not used or cited, as required in the assignment instructions. Noncredible sources are used.Source relevance is vague or inconsistent. References from appropriate sources are not used: two or three resources exclusive of assigned course readings.Source relevance is mostly applicable and appropriate. References from appropriate sources are used: two to three resources exclusive of assigned course readings.Source relevance is applicable and appropriate in all instances. References from appropriate sources are included: three or more resources exclusive of assigned course readings.Source relevance is applicable and appropriate in all instances and sparks interest in the reader to pursue further investigation. References from appropriate sources and included: more than three resources exclusive of assigned course readings.
25.0 %Presentation Development 
10.0 %LayoutPresentation is not in a PPT file: presentation is in another format (e.g., Word, Excel, etc.), or the layout is cluttered, confusing, and does not use spacing, headings, and subheadings to enhance the readability. The text is extremely difficult to read with long blocks of text, small point size for fonts, and inappropriate contrasting colors. Poor use of headings, subheadings, indentations, or bold formatting is evident.The layout shows some structure, but appears cluttered and busy or distracting with large gaps of white space or a distracting background. Overall readability is difficult due to lengthy paragraphs, too many different fonts, dark or busy background, overuse of bold, or lack of appropriate indentations of text.The layout uses horizontal and vertical white space appropriately. Sometimes the fonts are easy to read, but in a few places the use of fonts, italics, bold, long paragraphs, color, or busy background detracts from or does not enhance readability. Presentation provides some graphics, some of which promote more efficient understanding while others are somewhat superficially attractive and entertaining but not necessarily relevant or instructive.The layout background and text complement each other and enable the content to be easily read. The fonts are easy to read and point size varies appropriately for headings and text. The background and colors enhance readability of the text. Presentation provides some graphics, most of which promote more efficient understanding while one or two are somewhat superficially attractive and entertaining but not necessarily relevant or instructive.The layout is visually pleasing and contributes to the overall message with appropriate use of headings, subheadings, and white space. Text is appropriate in length for the target audience and to the point. The background and colors enhance the readability of the text. Presentation provides graphics that promote more efficient understanding, avoiding the use of graphics that are superficially attractive and entertaining but are not necessarily relevant or instructive.
5.0 %SlidesPresentation does not provide the number of slides (10-12, not including cover or reference slides) as specified in the assignment. Presentation does not provide a title slide with group members’ names or a conclusion slide as specified in the assignment.Presentation does not provide number of slides (10-12, not including cover or reference slides) as specified in the assignment. Either a title slide with group members’ names or a conclusions slide is missing.N/AN/APresentation provides the number of slides (10-12, not including cover or reference slides) as well as a title slide with group members’ names and a conclusion slide as specified in the assignment.
10.0 %Language Use and Audience Awareness (includes sentence construction, word choice, etc.)Inappropriate word choice and lack of variety in language use are evident. Writer is unaware of audience. Use of primer prose indicates writer either does not apply figures of speech or uses them inappropriately.Some distracting inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. The writer exhibits some lack of control in using figures of speech appropriately.Language is appropriate to the targeted audience for the most part.The writer is clearly aware of audience, uses a variety of appropriate vocabulary for the targeted audience, and uses figures of speech to communicate clearly.The writer uses a variety of sentence constructions, figures of speech, and word choice in distinctive and creative ways that are appropriate to purpose, discipline, and scope.
10.0 %Format 
5.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)Slide errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning.Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the audience.Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the audience.Slides are largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present.Writer is clearly in control of standard, written, academic English.
5.0 %Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)Sources are not documented.Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.
100 %Total Weightage 

 

 

Our Score
[Total: 0 Av: 0]
Find Us On Social Media

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes:

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>